XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[shirasu hiroyuki <hirsh AT s9.dion.ne.jp>]

Dear Wolfgang,

Thank you very much for your valuable suggestion.

> I would also suggest bumping the number of repetitions to a larger 
> number. The idea is to have each test case run for, say > 5 secs. That 
> way the results become more reliable considering hotspot VM 
> compilation, and hence more relevant. Adding some more complex 
> expressions might be interesting as well.

According your suggestion, I hope to improve my test mesurements.


> > Thanks. Care to add the XOM CVS XPath support as well as Nux to your 
> > tests?

Yes, I will. But I have some question.
I used the JAXP 1.3 API of Saxon 8.2 in my tests.
Does XPath engine of Nux use Saxon?

Thanks,
--
shirasu hiroyuki(hirsh AT s9.dion.ne.jp)


From: Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek AT lbl.gov>
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Performance of Java XPath engines
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:52:36 -0800

> I would also suggest bumping the number of repetitions to a larger 
> number. The idea is to have each test case run for, say > 5 secs. That 
> way the results become more reliable considering hotspot VM 
> compilation, and hence more relevant. Adding some more complex 
> expressions might be interesting as well.
> 
> Cheers,
> Wolfgang.