xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Re: [XOM-interest] Relative namespace URIs

From: Elliotte Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
To: Michael Kay <mike AT saxonica.com>
Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Relative namespace URIs
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:22:38 -0400

How does XSLT 2 (and Saxon 8) handle this? The XPath 2.0 Data Model is defined in terms of the Infoset, and a document that uses relative namespace URIs has no infoset. Is this an area in which XSLT 2 and XSLT 1 (and XPath 2.0 and XPath 1.0) are incompatible?

--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo AT metalab.unc.edu

[XOM-interest] Relative namespace URIs, Michael Kay, 10/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Relative namespace URIs, Elliotte Harold, 10/02/2004
  - RE: [XOM-interest] Relative namespace URIs, Michael Kay, 10/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Relative namespace URIs, Elliotte Harold, 10/02/2004
  - RE: [XOM-interest] Relative namespace URIs, Michael Kay, 10/02/2004
    - Re: [XOM-interest] Relative namespace URIs, Elliotte Harold, 10/03/2004
    - Re: [XOM-interest] Relative namespace URIs, Elliotte Harold, 10/03/2004