xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed
- From: John Cowan <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed
- Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 13:04:34 -0400
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> When a Document object is passed to an XSLTransform constructor it is
> written into a StringBuffer which is then passed to TrAX as a
> StringReader. Thus it gets parsed twice. In any case, it is more
> efficient just to pass in the Reader/InputStream/File/URL rather than
> a Document.
I'm stunned that you do this. It would seem so straightforward to
use SAXConverter, souped up a bit to make it an XMLReader rather than
just a ContentHandler. (If you remember, I suggested a while back
that SAXConverter produce an XMLReader.)
--
One Word to write them all, John Cowan <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
One Access to find them, http://www.reutershealth.com
One Excel to count them all, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
And thus to Windows bind them. --Mike Champion
-
[XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/01/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
John Cowan, 09/01/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, John Cowan, 09/04/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
John Cowan, 09/04/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
John Cowan, 09/04/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, McEniry, Michael, 09/04/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed,
John Cowan, 09/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.