xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed

From: John Cowan <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:40:11 -0400

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> The specific problem is that they do not provide base URLs for the
> stylesheet, thereby preventing the resolution of relative URLs found
> in xsl:import and xsl:include elements and document() functions.

File objects can't reliably be converted to a base URI either.

> I prefer the third option which would leave this class with just a
> single constructor.

I agree.

--
"May the hair on your toes never fall out!" John Cowan
--Thorin Oakenshield (to Bilbo) jcowan AT reutershealth.com

[XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/01/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, John Cowan, 09/01/2004
  - Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
    - Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, John Cowan, 09/04/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
  - Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
    - Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, John Cowan, 09/04/2004
      - Re: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/04/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [XOM-interest] XSLTransform constructors are flawed, McEniry, Michael, 09/04/2004