XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[jcowan AT reutershealth.com]

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> OK. Based on this I made that change. Code will be in CVS soon if it 
> isn't already. However, my benchmarks were not able to measure any 
> performance difference between the two cases. If there is one, it's 
> below my resolution.

I note that Serializer is recursive,
and should be fixed on the same grounds:  see
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/xom-interest/2002-September/000082.html
for the non-recursive tree-walking algorithm I used in DOMParser.

Note also that the above message proposes an extension to SAXConverter to
make it a full XMLReader; the parse() methods ignore their arguments, and
aSaxConverter.setProperty("http://xom.nu/properties/xom-node";, aDocument)
specifies which document to walk.  You never actually rejected this,
and it's very simple and allows code that expects to be instantiating
a SAX parser to do so with minimal change.

-- 
A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: jcowan AT reutershealth.com]
Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre                http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael 
Kay