XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[Laurent Bihanic <laurent.bihanic AT atosorigin.com>]

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>     public void removeChild(int position)
>     public void removeChild(Node child)

+1 also I don't remember ever using such a feature. But it looks quite 
convenient.

>     public Node removeChild(int position)
>     public Node removeChild(Node child)

+1 also I don't remember ever using such a feature. But it looks quite 
convenient.

> Second question: does it make sense for both methods to return the node 
> removed? or just the one that removes by position? After all, when the 
> method removes a specific child node, you must already have a reference 
> to that node. Then again, it may be conceptually cleaner for both 
> removeChild methods to return the same thing. Thoughts?

Yes, always return the removed node object.

Laurent