xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?
- From: John Cowan <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
- To: laurent.bihanic AT atosorigin.com (Laurent Bihanic)
- Cc: jcowan AT reutershealth.com (John Cowan), xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 07:28:52 -0400 (EDT)
Laurent Bihanic scripsit:
> >>Just to nag: Why not toXMLString() (toXmlString()) to clearly mark that
> >>the
> >>output is not an XML document.
> >
> > Au contraire: the output *is* an XML document, because an XML document
> > is a textual object. XOM is not XML.
>
> The output is not a document: A (well-formed) XML document contains one and
> only one root element.
Well, okay. But my point stands: XML is textual, and getXML (I prefer
this capitalization, based on the Java treatment of "URI" and other
acronyms whether pronounceable or not) is a very sensible name for
something that returns a text.
--
John Cowan jcowan AT reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com
www.ccil.org/~cowan
"The exception proves the rule." Dimbulbs think: "Your counterexample proves
my theory." Classicists think "'Probat' means 'tests': the exception puts the
rule to the proof." But legal historians know it means "Evidence for an
exception is evidence of the existence of a rule in cases not excepted from."
-
[XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/19/2002
-
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
Bradley S. Huffman, 09/20/2002
- Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/20/2002
-
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
Kevin Herrboldt, 09/25/2002
- Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?, John Cowan, 09/25/2002
-
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
Rolf Lohaus, 09/20/2002
- Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/30/2002
-
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
Laurent Bihanic, 09/20/2002
-
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
John Cowan, 09/20/2002
-
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
Laurent Bihanic, 09/20/2002
- Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?, John Cowan, 09/20/2002
- Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 09/20/2002
-
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
Laurent Bihanic, 09/20/2002
-
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
John Cowan, 09/20/2002
-
Re: [XOM-interest] toXML() instead of getStringForm()?,
Bradley S. Huffman, 09/20/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.