XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[Laurent Bihanic <laurent.bihanic AT atosorigin.com>]

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> John Naylor suggested the following name change:
>
> i just gave xom a quick look and like much of what i see.  just one comment
> for now, have you considered toXml() instead of getStringForm().
>
> Now that he mentions it, that does sound reasonable, though I would 
> prefer toXML() instead of toXml(). Thoughts?

Just to nag: Why not toXMLString() (toXmlString()) to clearly mark that the 
output is not an XML document.

Or even better: toString(), unless you see a good reason to keep the existing 
"[<class>: ...]". Debugging?

Laurent