typicalgirls AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa 1975-1980s)
List archive
Re: [TypicalGirls] SUBMIT BLURBS PLEASE! We're up to 22 must-haves!
- From: burt AT macalester.edu
- To: "Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa 1975-1980s)" <typicalgirls AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [TypicalGirls] SUBMIT BLURBS PLEASE! We're up to 22 must-haves!
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:42:04 -0500 (CDT)
Thanks, Dan. I missed that part in my attempt to catch up on our activity...
...and that's a shame about Salem 66. Looks like there's no Dolly Mixture in
print these days either...
s
>>I narrowed our list down to 1975-1984 because that was the general time
period I intended when I created the listserv. I've been waffling on that
decision, but (in the end) I'm going to stand by it.<<
Salem 66 apparently formed in '82 & debuted with a 12" on Homestead in '84,
so I'd say they would definitley merit consideration ... *if* they had
anything in print. Unfortunately, that seems not to be the case.
Looks like Scrawl formed in '85, went into the studio for the first time in
'86, had their first release in '87. I'd say they miss the cut-off.
Dan
--- Begin Message --->Or is there a chronological cutoff (around 1985, to judge by the list we
- From: "dan bailey" <dpbailey AT att.net>
- To: "Typical Girls: Women in Punk/Post-Punk/Underground Music (Circa 1975-1980s)" <typicalgirls AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [TypicalGirls] SUBMIT BLURBS PLEASE! We're up to 22 must-haves!
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 12:25:09 -0500
>already have)? If there's a 1985-86 cutoff, Salem 66 and/or Scrawl should
>just sneak in... do either of them belong?<
Quoting Dina --
>>I narrowed our list down to 1975-1984 because that was the general time
period I intended when I created the listserv. I've been waffling on that
decision, but (in the end) I'm going to stand by it.<<
Salem 66 apparently formed in '82 & debuted with a 12" on Homestead in '84,
so I'd say they would definitley merit consideration ... *if* they had
anything in print. Unfortunately, that seems not to be the case.
Looks like Scrawl formed in '85, went into the studio for the first time in
'86, had their first release in '87. I'd say they miss the cut-off.
Dan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> TypicalGirls mailing list
> TypicalGirls AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/typicalgirls
>
_______________________________________________
TypicalGirls mailing list
TypicalGirls AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/typicalgirls
--- End Message ---
-
Re: [TypicalGirls] The Dance
, (continued)
- Re: [TypicalGirls] The Dance, Aaron levin, 06/03/2007
- Re: [TypicalGirls] The Dance, Daniel Selzer, 06/03/2007
- Re: [TypicalGirls] The Dance, Aaron levin, 06/03/2007
- Re: [TypicalGirls] The Dance, Dina Hornreich, 06/03/2007
-
[TypicalGirls] chronological cutoff,
Dina Hornreich, 06/03/2007
-
Re: [TypicalGirls] chronological cutoff,
Hilary Jaeger, 06/04/2007
-
Re: [TypicalGirls] chronological cutoff,
Dina Hornreich, 06/04/2007
- Re: [TypicalGirls] chronological cutoff, Hilary Jaeger, 06/04/2007
-
Re: [TypicalGirls] chronological cutoff,
Dina Hornreich, 06/04/2007
-
Re: [TypicalGirls] chronological cutoff,
Hilary Jaeger, 06/04/2007
- Re: [TypicalGirls] SUBMIT BLURBS PLEASE! We're up to 22 must-haves!, dan bailey, 06/03/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.