Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-users - Re: [SM-Users] An idea to improve our ability to include new spells...

sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Sourcemage Users List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma AT webjockey.net>
  • To: <sm-users AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Users] An idea to improve our ability to include new spells...
  • Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:51:37 -0500

On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:04, David Pradier wrote:
> Is it possible to make an engine on the website www.sourcemage.org to
> propose new spells ?
>
> Let me describe how it could work :
> Somebody with a new spell uploads it to the website, compressed, selects in
> which section(s) it should go, and gives his email address.
> The engine uncompresses it, based on the extension, and puts it in a new
> codex named something like "proposed" ; the tarball is re-calculated and
> available for everybody, just like "test" or "devel" or "stable".
>
> Of course, it would need the possibility to use different codex at the same
> time ; can we ? If not, are subsections possible ?

There's only one codex, but several grimoires can be available at once:
phma@blackcat:~/abi/abi$ cat /etc/sorcery/local/grimoire
GRIMOIRE_DIR[0]=/var/lib/sorcery/codex/local
GRIMOIRE_DIR[2]=/var/lib/sorcery/codex/stable
GRIMOIRE_DIR[1]=/var/lib/sorcery/codex/devel
GRIMOIRE_DIR[3]=/var/lib/sorcery/codex/test
Add "proposed" as number 4.

Currently, if local has a section net with a couple of spells in it, and the
other grimoires have many more spells in the net section, "gaze version net"
shows only the ones in local. This I think is a bug.

phma




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page