Discussion of Sorcery related topics

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:57:04PM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>:
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:25, Eric Schabell wrote:
> > > We have a possible new Sorcery Leader in the form of a well known and
> > > experienced Smgl'er:
> > >
> > > Andrew Stitt (a.k.a. afraydknot)
> > >
[...]
> > As a previously active guru I support Andrew's application to head 
> > sorcery.
> > His previous work on sorcery and prometheus, his activity and discussions 
> > in
> > 
> > bugzilla, his attendance on IRC and self-designated role as channel 
> > greeter, 
> > 
> > his support for me (and others) in many of my (our) mini-projects, his 
> > overall knowledge of the people and the project, these are all the 
> > reasons 
> > why I think he will make a good sorcery lead.
> > 
> > Hamish
> 
> There aren't too many people on the Sorcery Team to be voting. Perhaps we 
> should
> talk about how Team Leads are to be nominated/voted? What scope of voters? 
> We
> decided at the last dev meeting that there /would/ be a vote for Leads and 
> that
> the PL would initiate the vote and tally the responses (however, your 
> current
> PL has been busy and didn't initiate a vote, but there's one already going,
> so... ;)). I believe we also said that all developers have a vote in 
> choosing a
> Lead, but correct me if I'm wrong or it's a bad idea and we'll talk. ;)

Yes, all developers have a vote in this.

> Shall we start this process as we described at the meeting? Keep the 
> current one
> going?

Seeing that Andrew is the only canditate it'll be a yes/no vote, but we
should make it an official vote anyway. I'd say start the vote as we
decided at the meeting.

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz                               Sourcemage GNU/Linux developer
                                                    http://www.sourcemage.org