Discussion of Sorcery related topics

[Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:25, Eric Schabell wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> We have a possible new Sorcery Leader in the form of a well known and
> experienced Smgl'er:
>
> Andrew Stitt (a.k.a. afraydknot)
>
> If there are others, I would like to start a discussion with responses
> from the Sorcery Developers (see org chart) only as to the possible
> other candidates, votes for / against this one, or thoughts on the
> subject.
>
> I would like to get this done as soon as possible, so let youself be
> heard. I will count the incomming votes and let you all know asap the
> final outcome. Please post all replys here if you would.

Having waited a week for any response, but seen none, I have to say what a 
load of horsecrap this is.
This is not an internal issue for the sorcery team to discuss, it is for the 
project to discuss. All the grimoire gurus, all the sorcery team, all the 
iso/cauldron team, even all the users if they wish to be involved. It is not 
just about who wants to lead a team of developers, it is about their skill 
set, the standard of their work, their communication skills, their 
availability and their approachability. Anything less than full open 
discussion of applications to help steer this project is a farce.

As a previously active guru I support Andrew's application to head sorcery.
His previous work on sorcery and prometheus, his activity and discussions in 
bugzilla, his attendance on IRC and self-designated role as channel greeter,  
his support for me (and others) in many of my (our) mini-projects, his 
overall knowledge of the people and the project, these are all the reasons 
why I think he will make a good sorcery lead.

Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAVQWj8fSufZR6424RAqgAAJ0RQr4tMnSMosWuuozwhYRIXIo2YgCfQygF
DUXtwwmqRdafYFcrmFoTh9Y=
=cpTN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----