sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries
- From: Gareth Clay <garethclay AT ntlworld.com>
- To: SM Sorcery mailing list <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 02:28:21 +0000 (GMT)
> If the rescue CD has a static bash on it, it would be simple to just mv
> /mnt/root/bin/bash somewhere, then cp the static bash there... and
> presto chango, you have a working chroot.
A static bash on the rescue cd would be ideal :)
> busybox has normal shell stuff as well as tar and thing I believe. ash
> is another small shell that could be considered. I have not used either.
Busybox is okay, although it can be frustrating at first because it's not
exactly like its GNU counterparts. As for ash, I haven't used that either,
I just read an article recently recommending it as a good rescue shell if
staticly compiled.
-
[SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries,
Gareth Clay, 11/01/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries, Andrew, 11/01/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries,
Dufflebunk, 11/01/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries,
Gareth Clay, 11/01/2002
-
[SM-Sorcery]X Compile fails,
Marcus Martin, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]X Compile fails, Julian v. Bock, 11/02/2002
-
[SM-Sorcery]X Compile fails,
Marcus Martin, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries,
Gareth Clay, 11/01/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.