sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: SM Sorcery mailing list <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 15:07:49 -0800
> It would be great if we could have a small, static
> shell like ash for rescue purposes.
>
i think sash (stand alone shell) qualifys as a 'small' static shell.
-
[SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries,
Gareth Clay, 11/01/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries, Andrew, 11/01/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries,
Dufflebunk, 11/01/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries,
Gareth Clay, 11/01/2002
-
[SM-Sorcery]X Compile fails,
Marcus Martin, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]X Compile fails, Julian v. Bock, 11/02/2002
-
[SM-Sorcery]X Compile fails,
Marcus Martin, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Re: [SM-Discuss] glibc 2.2.5 -> 3.2.1 update probs / sorcery save_libraries,
Gareth Clay, 11/01/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.