Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Yoav Avitzour <avitzour AT princeton.edu>
  • To: Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org>
  • Cc: Aaron Brice <abrice2 AT cox.net>, Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>, Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>, Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order
  • Date: 20 Sep 2002 13:30:39 -0400

Besides, this is why we have section maintainers...

Yoav

On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:48, Tony Smith wrote:
> Try it. It depends what you're looking for, but it's not as easy as you
> might think. Spell creators have to know about rules anyway, and some
> rules are worth knowing. Especially if they help us maintain a reliable
> grimoire.
>
> Tony.
>
> On Friday 20 September 2002 16:28, Aaron Brice wrote:
> > I think that making gaze grep DETAILS rather than executing it would be
> > a better fix than relying on spell creators to know about rules.
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 06:01, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> > > I think that sounds like a /great/ rule. It just makes sense, though it
> > > will cause undo anguish to people like W0rf with his kernel spell.
> > >
> > > Nick? What are your thoughts?
> > >
> > > -Ryan
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Tony Smith" <tony AT smee.org>
> > > To: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>; "Aaron Brice"
> > > <abrice2 AT cox.net> Cc: "Nick Jennings" <nkj AT namodn.com>; "Dufflebunk"
> > > <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>; <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 7:51 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday 18 September 2002 11:21, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> > > > > Because then things like "gaze search" start popping up dialogs
> > > > > asking which version of k18n you want to install.
> > > >
> > > > IMHO I think this needs sorting out anyway. I'd like to propose that
> > > > we mandate that all DETAILS files must not interact with the user.
> > > > Those that do are currently breaking scripts.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Tony
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SM-Sorcery mailing list
> > > > SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SM-Sorcery mailing list
> > > SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page