sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Aaron Brice <abrice2 AT cox.net>
- To: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: Tony Smith <tony AT smee.org>, Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>, Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order
- Date: 20 Sep 2002 08:28:52 -0700
I think that making gaze grep DETAILS rather than executing it would be
a better fix than relying on spell creators to know about rules.
Aaron
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 06:01, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> I think that sounds like a /great/ rule. It just makes sense, though it will
> cause undo anguish to people like W0rf with his kernel spell.
>
> Nick? What are your thoughts?
>
> -Ryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Smith" <tony AT smee.org>
> To: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>; "Aaron Brice" <abrice2 AT cox.net>
> Cc: "Nick Jennings" <nkj AT namodn.com>; "Dufflebunk"
> <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>; <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 7:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order
>
>
> > On Wednesday 18 September 2002 11:21, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> > > Because then things like "gaze search" start popping up dialogs asking
> > > which version of k18n you want to install.
> >
> > IMHO I think this needs sorting out anyway. I'd like to propose that we
> > mandate that all DETAILS files must not interact with the user. Those that
> > do are currently breaking scripts.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Sorcery mailing list
> > SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
-
[SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Nick Jennings, 09/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Dufflebunk, 09/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Aaron Brice, 09/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Dufflebunk, 09/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Nick Jennings, 09/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Aaron Brice, 09/18/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Ryan Abrams, 09/18/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order, Tony Smith, 09/20/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order, Ryan Abrams, 09/20/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order, Wolfgang Scheicher, 09/20/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order, Aaron Brice, 09/20/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order, Tony Smith, 09/20/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order, Yoav Avitzour, 09/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Ryan Abrams, 09/18/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order, Nick Jennings, 09/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Aaron Brice, 09/18/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order, Dufflebunk, 09/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Nick Jennings, 09/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Dufflebunk, 09/17/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Aaron Brice, 09/16/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Dufflebunk, 09/16/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order,
Andrew, 09/16/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]CONFIGURE & DETAILS order, Ryan Abrams, 09/16/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.