sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- Cc: Mads Laursen <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:53:36 -0700
So, if your in some other scripting language you have to send out a
call to set some environment variable before you call gaze? If I understand
correctly, i don't think that's sufficient support. I'll look into
adding a command-line toggle.
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 04:06:13PM -0500, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> Done.
>
> If GAZE_VERBOSE is set to 0 it will use old style search results. Anything
> else will get you the new hotness.
>
> -Ryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mads Laursen" <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk>
> To: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
> Cc: <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search
>
>
> > On 09/09/02 15.31, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> > > How about I make gaze check for a sorcery config option. If it's
> disabled,
> > > it uses old style. if it's enabled it uses new style. and I will add
> a -v
> > > flag to toggle that setting to the other.
> > >
> > > Sound decent, or would an environment variable be better than a sorcery
> > > config option?
> > >
> > I'm not at my box at the moment, but I seem to recall that the sorcery
> > options are set with something like var=${var:=arg}, or something like
> > it, which keeps the value of the environment variable.
> >
> > Done like that the power of bash should give us the best of both
> > worlds.
> >
> > And if not either way will probably be fine (at least by me), as long
> > as a "persistent" setting is available (heck, if it was
> > hard/impossible (NOT saying that it is) I would live without).
> >
> > So if this was helpful I will look forward to seeing your
> > implementation, and thank you in advance.
> >
> > /dossen
> >
> > Offtopic: Some time ago I did some smgl specific bits for the
> > bash-completion, which I believe have been firmly broken by the new
> > sorcery (and it probably needed to be anyway). I will try to find time
> > shortly to fix it, using as much of the sorcery infrastructure as
> > possible (depends on how much it seems reasonable to source for this
> > type of feature). I guess it also needs a going after to make sure it
> > has all the options of sorcery... or computes them ;-)
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Sorcery mailing list
> > SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
-
[SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Andrew Stitt, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Mads Laursen, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search, Mads Laursen, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Mads Laursen, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search, Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search, Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search, Ryan Abrams, 09/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search, Nick Jennings, 09/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search, Dufflebunk, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Mads Laursen, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Nick Jennings, 09/09/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search,
Ryan Abrams, 09/09/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.