Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: "Mads Laursen" <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk>
  • Cc: <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search
  • Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:06:13 -0500

Done.

If GAZE_VERBOSE is set to 0 it will use old style search results. Anything
else will get you the new hotness.

-Ryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mads Laursen" <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk>
To: "Ryan Abrams" <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
Cc: <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]gaze search


> On 09/09/02 15.31, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> > How about I make gaze check for a sorcery config option. If it's
disabled,
> > it uses old style. if it's enabled it uses new style. and I will add
a -v
> > flag to toggle that setting to the other.
> >
> > Sound decent, or would an environment variable be better than a sorcery
> > config option?
> >
> I'm not at my box at the moment, but I seem to recall that the sorcery
> options are set with something like var=${var:=arg}, or something like
> it, which keeps the value of the environment variable.
>
> Done like that the power of bash should give us the best of both
> worlds.
>
> And if not either way will probably be fine (at least by me), as long
> as a "persistent" setting is available (heck, if it was
> hard/impossible (NOT saying that it is) I would live without).
>
> So if this was helpful I will look forward to seeing your
> implementation, and thank you in advance.
>
> /dossen
>
> Offtopic: Some time ago I did some smgl specific bits for the
> bash-completion, which I believe have been firmly broken by the new
> sorcery (and it probably needed to be anyway). I will try to find time
> shortly to fix it, using as much of the sorcery infrastructure as
> possible (depends on how much it seems reasonable to source for this
> type of feature). I guess it also needs a going after to make sure it
> has all the options of sorcery... or computes them ;-)
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page