sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:57:53 -0700
I hate to keep complaining about this one but....
The other day I was looking at lunar linux's software setup. I guess just
to see what the other camp was up to, mainly i wanted to see what their
1.0 beta consited of. They havent added much in the way of config options,
but their optimization menu has way more stuff then ours does. They
have a complete menu system that lets you choose flags for gcc2 and 3,
and goes way beyond just the 5 or 6 'speedy' 'small' etc options we
have. I think we should a) expand our menus like they did and/or b)
include a field to put in whatever options by hand you want.
'a' would certainly be flashy and cool, and 'b' is certainly easy to implement
and removes the limiting effect menu's have.
thoughts?
-
[SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Nick Jennings, 09/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags, Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Chris Brien, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags, Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Chris Brien, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags, Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Nick Jennings, 09/06/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.