sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 16:39:25 -0700
>
> Perhaps you could list off these options? I don't plan on installing
> lunar linux anytime soon to look for myself :)
last time i put their stuff on my system to look at i broke my machine
with an extra -r to remove it when i was done, but very well i'll post
later with all the options they have.
>
> > I think we should a) expand our menus like they did and/or b)
> > include a field to put in whatever options by hand you want.
>
> 'a' yes, 'b' would be ok as a secondary feature, but not in replace of
> 'a'.
>
whats wrong with having both, perhaps b as part of a "anything we missed
you want to add in?" basically it can just be a variable field thats
added onto CFLAGS at the same time as when you are parsing those menu
options into the CFLAGS string. its incredibly easy to implement.
-
[SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Nick Jennings, 09/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags, Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Chris Brien, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags, Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Chris Brien, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags, Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]compiler flags,
Nick Jennings, 09/06/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.