sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] distcc and other chipsets
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:22:01 -0800
Quoting Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>:
> Hey all,
>
> I just fixed a few packages which failed on my new install of my laptop
> using
> distcc, so I fixed them to not. Then some more started failing, and I got to
> wondering, did no one else have these problems? Then I realized what I was
> doing, my laptop is a Pentium III, the other two machines I have it sending
> distcc requests to are an Athlon Thunderbird and an Athlon XP. Could this be
> what's causing errors that setting DISTCC_HOSTS= in DETAILS fixes? Is this
> something we should worry about, or just tell people to use the same
> chipsets
> when using distcc? Most of the packages (most of xfce4-profile, dependencies
> of
> qt-x11, a few gnome2-libs) compiled fine, but some did not. Should we be
> turning distcc off for any package that fails to compile on systems with
> different CPUs?
>
> I'd say "yes", just to keep things simple and working, but a better fix
> would
> be
> to have our gcc be a cross-compiler and we tell people to have gcc compiled
> for
> all architectures they have on their network if they want to use distcc, but
> that's more work than I (and probably others) have time to put in. Are there
> simple flags we can send through distcc to have it compile for a pentium3 on
> an
> athlon-xp without making gcc a cross compiler?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -sandalle
Nevermind, while talking to rycee on IRC we found that gcc has to be the same
version (one of the machines was 3.3.2, the rest 3.3.3). ;)
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Grimoire] distcc and other chipsets,
Eric Sandall, 02/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] distcc and other chipsets, Eric Sandall, 02/27/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] distcc and other chipsets,
Eric Sandall, 02/27/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] distcc and other chipsets, Hamish Greig, 02/27/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.