sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:15:20 +1100
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:16, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i was just wondering, do we want the nptl glibc and glibc-kernel-headers
> in stable for our 1.0? Imho we should get them in, unless someone had a
> major breakage of the glibc spell in test/devel recently. With those in
> we have quite good support for running 2.6 kernels, without them it's
> basically impossible.
>
> On a related note, it seems no spell copies or symlinks kernel headers
> to /usr/include in stable (unless i'm blind). How is that supposed to
> work?
forgot to say, the reason I rewrote glibc spell was to fix the upgrade
problem (veterans will remember) and also this
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
which happens to 50% of new users when they rebuild with their architecture
options. SO it should definitely be in stable for 1.0
Hamish
Attachment:
pgpWTgEfgXAta.pgp
Description: signature
-
[SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers, David C. Haley, 02/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers, Hamish Greig, 02/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers,
Hamish Greig, 02/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers, Eric Sandall, 02/18/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.