sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 19:16:47 +0100
Hi,
i was just wondering, do we want the nptl glibc and glibc-kernel-headers
in stable for our 1.0? Imho we should get them in, unless someone had a
major breakage of the glibc spell in test/devel recently. With those in
we have quite good support for running 2.6 kernels, without them it's
basically impossible.
On a related note, it seems no spell copies or symlinks kernel headers
to /usr/include in stable (unless i'm blind). How is that supposed to
work?
--
Arwed v. Merkatz
Grimoire Guru for video
Grimoire Guru for xfce
Sourcemage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
-
[SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers,
Arwed von Merkatz, 02/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers, David C. Haley, 02/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers, Hamish Greig, 02/17/2004
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers,
Hamish Greig, 02/17/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] glibc and kernel headers, Eric Sandall, 02/18/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.