Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] New init system?

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Bearcat M. Sandor" <Sorcerer AT TheDragonsEdge.com>
  • To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] New init system?
  • Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:56:30 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks,

Personally, I don't understand why simple-init woudl be considered a dead
end.
I like it. I think it's great to have init system that actually does one run
level after another. When I first read about it I thought "Duh! This is how
it should be."

Bearcat

On Monday 24 November 2003 20:47 in an email titled "Re: [SM-Grimoire] New
init system?" Eric Sandall wrote:
>Quoting Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
>> I think we should wait until a fork is necessary before going ahead with
>> doing it. theres no need to uselessly fork something when we have no need
>> to improve the code or fix any bugs with it at the moment. If the need
>> arises I can help out with it, as im sure many of us could. But for now,
>> I think we ought to just leave things as they are.
>
>That's what I was thinking as well, but figured I'd mention the possibility
> so that it's out there. :)
>
>-sandalle
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/wtL4ya+RPo9ly58RAn0kAJoDY5/79/J0D/ZYRgg5G3rSoJlwfgCdF/vD
LeUMIf3hbWr36+YeauoQdBc=
=jZBu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page