Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

[Arwed von Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>]

On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 07:16:08PM +0200, Ladislav Hagara wrote:
> > I think the MAINTAINER file in the root of each section is enough. And 
> > HISTORY
> > tells the rest of the story.
> > Hamish
> 
> I really agree with Hamish.
> I suggested it one year ago
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/sm-grimoire/2002-October/000685.html
> Some gurus did not agree with it but their names are already written in 
> Hall of
> Fame 
> http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=Hall+of+Fame+for+past+developers
> 
> - lace -
 
I agree that the MAINTAINER field in DETAILS as it's used now is
useless, but that wasn't what i was proposing. Currently the MAINTAINER
field is either not present or ignored, i want to change that, so we can
move around spells more easily without confusing who the maintainer for
specific spells is. That way the ones who know most about a specific
spell, or who maintain most of its dependencies are the MAINTAINER of
that spell in whatever section it may be.

-- 
Arwed v. Merkatz
Grimoire Guru for video
Grimoire Guru for xfce
Sourcemage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org