Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] Merged spells and such

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jose Bernardo Silva" <jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com>
  • To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>, Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Merged spells and such
  • Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:08:44 +0000

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 13:28:06 +1000, Hamish Greig wrote
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> What would be a good plan for merging spells and such.
> I mentioned using the release cycle for deciding how long to leave a
> conflict in place ( in response to someone in the p4 mail list the
> other day) It would be nice to get a minor detail like this tied
> down before too many users get bitten by removal of spells like
> Xft(1,2) and bonobo-activation. I suggest at least one stable
> release cycle, but preferably two. IE in a few days stable grimoire
> is updated and released, any merged(or removed) spells should have
> conflicts or depends(on dummy spells) added and left until at least
> the next stable release in another month, but realistically I think
> it should be two months, not just one. Any thoughts on this ? Hamish
> - -- IRC nick: drmoriarty SMGL co-conspirator
> #Do You SMGL!?
> # Linux so advanced it may as well be magic!
> # http://www.sourcemage.org/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/iMpH8fSufZR6424RAmIKAKCEDy6hpSYMpOhxq2SfPQ34RK3o0wCaAsIm
> +JRcG3h2UtkKPgilzrloIdY=
> =d0lt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I vote for the two month period.

---
Jose Bernardo B R Silva | Source Mage GNU/Linux Section Guru
jbernardo AT sourcemage.org | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://counter.li.org #245602
http://cosmos.oninetspeed.pt/jose.bernardo
jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page