sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Craig Dyke <grail AT westnet.com.au>
- To: Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:25:34 -0000
Well I am having some better luck :))
Have managed to get 2.6.0 to compile and load.
I receive the following warnings during boot though
and wondered if anyone knew how to fix them:
1) ## I think these errors are something to do with devfsd setup?
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.
Mounted devfs on /dev
Freeing unused kernel memory: 124k freed
INIT: version 2.85 booting
mount: devfs already mounted or /dev busy
Started device management daemon v1.3.25 for /dev
Activating swap... Adding 1004020k swap on /dev/discs/disc0/part10.
Priority:-1
extents:1 [
OK ]
EXT3-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is
recommended
EXT3 FS on hde3, internal journal
Mounting local filesystems...
modprobe: FATAL: Module shm not found.
mount: fs type shm not supported by kernel
This also gives me a "failed" error once all partitions have been
loaded.
2) ## syslogd warning?
process `syslogd' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
Happy for any suggestions?
Craig
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 00:40, Jose Bernardo Silva wrote:
> > >
> > Another point guys for module loading. The new modprobe uses
> > /etc/modprobe.conf not /etc/modules.conf. The syntax appears the
> > same so a "cp" should work. THIS FROM THE KERNEL MAILING LISTS. JohnC
>
> You should use "/sbin/generate-modprobe.conf /etc/modprobe.conf" to generate
> modprobe.conf form your /etc/modules and your /det/modules.conf.
>
> Right now I can boot into 2.6.0-test1 with devfsd if I pass
> "boot=/dev/discs/disc0/part3" in the append line, besides having it set in
> lilo. Don't ask me why this works... My problem now is konsole failing to
> load, and the touchpad (a synaptics one) not working... A strace konsole
> should help on the fist problem, on the second I have no idea, because a
> /dev/psaux exists.
-
[SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
Craig Dyke, 07/19/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels, Jose Bernardo Silva, 07/19/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
John T Copeland, 07/19/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 07/19/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
John T Copeland, 07/19/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels, Jose Bernardo Silva, 07/19/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
John T Copeland, 07/19/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 07/19/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels, Craig Dyke, 07/20/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
John T Copeland, 07/20/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels, Jose Bernardo Silva, 07/20/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 07/19/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
John T Copeland, 07/19/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] 2.5 / 2.6 kernels,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 07/19/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.