Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] All Grimoire Gurus

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
  • To: Source Mage - Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] All Grimoire Gurus
  • Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 10:15:12 -0700

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:36:58AM +0200, Julian v. Bock wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "A" == Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com> writes:
>
> A> so in reference to a conversation with alley_cat and zero_the_hero
> A> this morning, is this really a good idea? does this really
> A> accomplish what we want? does it justify a grimoire wide change,
> A> and a 'from now on' attitude about how to write spells? spell
> A> writing can be fickle enough as it is, we dont want to introduce
> A> further complications by adding an error prone feature like this as
> A> a requirement to all future spells?
>
> I agree. While all this might be a nice thing, it doesn't justify the
> amount of work IMO. How many people here intend to do serious cross
> compilation with SMGL anyway (and I don't mean people who port SMGL to
> other architectures since this requires only some base spells to get
> compilation working on the target and needs to be done only once).

one thing i thought of was having yet another spell file (YASF), this one
could be CROSS_BUILD or something, it could be optional and marginally
unsupported functionality (i know, you're quivering about the unsupported
thing). At least that way we can split the work up. Just an idea to
toss around.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page