sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- To: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?
- Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 23:57:46 -0500
Perl has DB_File included which doesn't work with 4.0 version of DB. My 2.5.54 is OK (everything works) except for the /dev/shm which can't be mounted (filesystem not supported by the kernel is the error message). I had kernel panic: VFS unable to mount device 303 (03:03), but I found out that disabling "generic support for PCI IDE controllers" or some such, fixes this. I also think that devfs mounts itself onto /dev even with "devfs=nomount", but I didn't check that.
Robin Cook wrote:
Don't have Postfix installed on this system and don't use perl much so haven't seen any problems with them. I am only able to use the ac kernels because of the extra ATA-133 IDE card I have and unable to get 2.5.x kernel to compile here with the modules I need. Is there some reason perl doesn't show up depending (even optionally) on db? CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
-
[SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
M.L., 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, M.L., 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, M.L., 01/06/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, M.L., 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Dufflebunk, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.