sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Pierre Abbat <phma AT webjockey.net>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:07:56 -0500
On Thursday 02 January 2003 14:56, M.L. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> postfix 2 branch is stabilizing.
>
> Before updating postfix to 2.0.0.X in devel grimoire, I just want to warn
> you that postfix 2 breaks some postfix 1 features and config files...
>
> Please read the releases notes on www.postfix.org website before it's too
> late...
>
> http://postfix.portal-to-web.de/dist/index.html
> http://postfix.portal-to-web.de/dist/official/postfix-2.0.0.2.RELEASE_NOTES
> http://postfix.portal-to-web.de/dist/official/postfix-2.0.0.2.HISTORY
>>>
[Incompatibility 20021209] The Postfix SMTP server now rejects mail
for $mydestination domain recipients that it does not know about.
This keeps undeliverable mail out of your queue.
<<<
This also opens it up to Rumplestilzkin attacks. Can this be turned off?
phma
-
[SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
M.L., 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, M.L., 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, M.L., 01/06/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, M.L., 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Dufflebunk, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.