sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?
- From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?
- Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 22:11:09 -0600
Don't have Postfix installed on this system and don't use perl much so haven't seen any problems with them. I am only able to use the ac kernels because of the extra ATA-133 IDE card I have and unable to get 2.5.x kernel to compile here with the modules I need. Is there some reason perl doesn't show up depending (even optionally) on db?
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
How about postfix 1 and perl? They're both not even supposed to work with db 4.1 AFAIK.
Also, db 4.1 is using O_DIRECT flag when opening files (direct I/O), which consistently failed on all of my systems using three different kernel versions (2.4.19, 2.4.20, 2.5.54) on two different file systems (reiserfs, ext3) and two different disk architectures (IDE, Compaq RAID hardware), so I had to patch DB not use this flag by default. Had a lot of scary fun in the process.
Robin Cook wrote:
I have manually updated my system to DB 4.1.25 for a custom spell I am working and I have rebuilt all spells I have installed that depend on DB and so far all have compiled without a problem.
_______________________________________________
SM-Grimoire mailing list
SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
-
[SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
M.L., 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, M.L., 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, M.L., 01/06/2003
-
[SM-Grimoire] Berkeley DB 4.1 migration; WAS: Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 01/05/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, M.L., 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Robin Cook, 01/05/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Dufflebunk, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?, Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Ready for postfix 2.0 ?,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.