Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire]CALLING ALL GURU's!

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Eric Schabell <eric AT schabell.com>
  • To: Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu>
  • Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]CALLING ALL GURU's!
  • Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:03:18 +0200

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 08:35:26 -0500
Geoffrey Derber <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.edu> wrote:

> I have a couple questions, one about the md5 checksums.
>
> 1. One of the spells I have in my section pulls from CVS. The actuall
> download happens in the PRE_BUILD file. Now because CVS is constantly
> changing, I initially didn't see a way to MD5 sum this one. It was
> suggested to me a couple days ago to set a specific date revision, so
> I'll give that a try. But this brings me to my question. In sorcery,
> the devel version has the ability to download from CVS urls. Does
> sorcery pull a specific date revision, which can be checksumed, or does
> it pull the current version, which because of it's dynamic nature can
> not be checksumed? If it pulls the current version, how are we supposed
> to checksum it?
>
This is a good question, I think that you should be able to leave the field
blank but I would contact the Sorcery team (Nick or duffelbunk) about this
and please post their answer to me and the list. I can then add it to the
handbook. I am assuming that maybe we might not (call me crazy but...) be
including such spells in 1.0 for obvious reasons. ;)

> 2. Can we set very specific rules in the Guru hand book for rejection.
> Right now, I'm kind of wondering if the dowrloaderx app really should
> be in there, or if it should be elsewhere. And a specific set of rules:
> 1. License
> 2. Binary
>
Sure, you are the guru, let me see what your ideas are, we descuss/decide and
into the handbook they go! ;)

>
> And I think I just answered a third question I had by reading the hand
> book, it involved the license field for spells rejected due to licensing
> differences. It appears I would just make the url to the actual license
> webpage. Please confirm that.
>
Yep!

> Thanks,
> Geoff
>
Welcome!

--
Regards,

/*
* Eric Schabell
* web: http://www.schabell.com
* SourceMage: http://www.sourcemage.org
* Shopping: http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=sourcemage.0
* irc.openprojects.org (#sourcemage)
* nick -> erics
*/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page