sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things
- From: Treeve Jelbert <treeve AT scarlet.be>
- To: Remko van der Vossen <wich AT yuugen.jp>
- Cc: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things
- Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:17:39 +0100
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:55:27 +0100, Remko van der Vossen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:13:41PM +0100, Treeve Jelbert wrote:some programs use gperf to generate code, but also reference it from other routines, with different paramater types?
gperf only installs a binary, so triggers won't detect anything.
The only thing that we can do is ensure that all spells which use gperf
actually depend on it and then try to fix any broken source code.
Uh... so if there is no ABI, how can dependent builds fail on ABI
incompatible changes?
Regards, Remko
-
[SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things,
Thomas Orgis, 03/06/2017
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things,
Treeve Jelbert, 03/06/2017
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things, Vlad Glagolev, 03/06/2017
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things,
Treeve Jelbert, 03/06/2017
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things,
Remko van der Vossen, 03/06/2017
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things, Treeve Jelbert, 03/06/2017
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things,
Remko van der Vossen, 03/06/2017
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gperf update to 3.1 breaks things,
Treeve Jelbert, 03/06/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.