sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:15:01 -0600
On 12/02/2011 02:28 PM, flux wrote:
> Sukneet Basuta (sukneet AT gmail.com) wrote [11.12.03 04:20]:
>> Who exactly is in charge of setting the standards? Is it up to one
>> developer? Or must the lead developers have a vote?
Yeah for changing something like this, we should have a vote according
to the voting policy.
Don't let that discourage you from proposing changes though :)
David
>
> The community as a whole sets the standards. Any and all project-wide
> official policies (i.e., most if not all of the "policies" on the wiki)
> are determined via official votes carried out in accordance with [1].
> There are also policies per component that the component leads set.
> These tend to be more "minor" policies that don't really affect the
> community but only how development is carried out (e.g., policies on
> testing requirements, what kind of information goes into a commit log,
> etc.).
>
> 1:http://wiki.sourcemage.org/SourceMage/Voting_Policy
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
> !DSPAM:2,4ed930d0137136188916085!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
Sukneet Basuta, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
Remko van der Vossen, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
flux, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
Bor Kraljič, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
flux, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
Remko van der Vossen, 12/01/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, flux, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
Remko van der Vossen, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
Sukneet Basuta, 12/02/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
flux, 12/02/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
David Kowis, 12/02/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, Bor Kraljič, 12/03/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 12/03/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, Sukneet Basuta, 12/04/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, David Kowis, 12/09/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, flux, 12/13/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, Sukneet Basuta, 12/13/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, flux, 12/17/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
David Kowis, 12/02/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
flux, 12/02/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, Ismael Luceno, 12/12/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, flux, 12/13/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification, Ismael Luceno, 12/22/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
flux, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
Bor Kraljič, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
flux, 12/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GPG verification,
Remko van der Vossen, 12/01/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.