sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Bor Kraljič <pyrobor AT ver.si>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:05:57 +0200
Now that we have such function. I think it would be suitable that we add some
kind of warning for scm branch. That it might not build etc...
I mentioned this in issue #228 (http://www.sourcemage.org/issues/228#note-1).
Kind regards,
Bor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches, Bor Kraljič, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Ismael Luceno, 09/13/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches, Bor Kraljič, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
flux, 09/12/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Ismael Luceno, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
flux, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Ismael Luceno, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
flux, 09/13/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches, Ismael Luceno, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
flux, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Ismael Luceno, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
flux, 09/13/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches, Bor Kraljič, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Ismael Luceno, 09/13/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Bor Kraljič, 09/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 09/16/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Ismael Luceno, 09/19/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches, Bor Kraljič, 09/20/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Ismael Luceno, 09/19/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Spell branches,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 09/16/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.