Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] latex missing from texlive

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] latex missing from texlive
  • Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:25:00 -0500

texlive is failing during the install for me with the below error....
This is the newest version it git repository.

make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/texlive-20110705-source/texk'
`/usr/bin/mf-nowin' -> `mf'
/usr/src/texlive-20110705-source/old.binaries/usr/bin/fmtutil: line 362:
/texconfig/tcfmgr: No such file or directory
fmtutil: config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found.

CuZnDragon


On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 20:43 -0300, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> El Sat, 10 Sep 2011 08:09:45 +0900
> flux <flux AT sourcemage.org> escribió:
> > Sukneet Basuta (sukneet AT gmail.com) wrote [11.09.10 02:49]:
> > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:12 AM, flux <flux AT sourcemage.org> wrote:
> > > > Did you try ConTeXt MkII, or only MkIV? Note that MkIV is
> > > > LuaTeX-specific and won't work with other TeX engines, while MkII
> > > > is older but should work fine with pdftex, xetex, etc.
> > > >
> > >
> > > MkII seems to rely on luatex as well. I know that seems odd, but
> > > running texexec just gives me "/usr/bin/env: texlua: No such file or
> > > directory." I'm guess it requires luatex to start things.
> >
> > There are options to texexec for using different tex engines. Perhaps
> > they changed the default tex engine from pdftex to luatex. Can you try
> > running it with --pdftex or --xetex (or whatever the options are if
> > they have changed, man texexec should tell you). Also, it's possible
> > that the script to run ConTeXt (even for MkII) changed to "context"
> > rather than "texexec" (though I have doubts for this).
>
> I tried that and --engine too, with identical results. Maybe MkII has
> been deprecated...
>
> > Does luatex actually get installed by texlive? If so, perhaps we can
> > hunt down whatever config value is causing ConTeXt to not find it. If
> > it's not being installed, perhaps we can fix INSTALL to make it
> > install it (perhaps optionally so via CONFIGURE?).
>
> No, it's not being installed. Perhaps we need to pass some option to
> the configure script.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page