sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Bor Kraljič <pyrobor AT ver.si>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] master bugs on chiliproject
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:45:12 +0200
We have new bug tracker now on chiliproject. We started without any bugs.
Which is good since old bugzila had quite a few bugs to many:) But bugs on
new
issue tracker are piling up fast. We also have few "master" bugs. That brings
me to the point of this email.
In my opinion "master bug" should contain only short description of the
problem. And subtasks with more information for each small problem should be
created. (example http://sourcemage.org/issues/53) That way master bug offers
transparent view of what has already been done and what we still need to do.
Otherwise those bugs can really become hard to follow what has been done and
what not. (example http://sourcemage.org/issues/30).
Kind regards,
Bor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
[SM-Discuss] master bugs on chiliproject,
Bor Kraljič, 09/06/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] master bugs on chiliproject, David Kowis, 09/06/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.