sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] master bugs on chiliproject
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:44:09 -0500
On 09/06/2011 05:45 AM, Bor Kraljič wrote:
> We have new bug tracker now on chiliproject. We started without any bugs.
> Which is good since old bugzila had quite a few bugs to many:) But bugs on
> new
> issue tracker are piling up fast. We also have few "master" bugs. That
> brings
> me to the point of this email.
>
> In my opinion "master bug" should contain only short description of the
> problem. And subtasks with more information for each small problem should
> be
> created. (example http://sourcemage.org/issues/53) That way master bug
> offers
> transparent view of what has already been done and what we still need to
> do.
>
> Otherwise those bugs can really become hard to follow what has been done
> and
> what not. (example http://sourcemage.org/issues/30).
This is good advice in general to follow.
We can also take advantage of RoadMaps which make it easy to determine
what we're going to have in a release. Roadmaps can be shared amongst
projects as well, which can help us keep in sync if we have a release
that needs stuff in multiple projects to happen.
Keep up the good work :)
David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
[SM-Discuss] master bugs on chiliproject,
Bor Kraljič, 09/06/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] master bugs on chiliproject, David Kowis, 09/06/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.