Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] master bugs on chiliproject

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] master bugs on chiliproject
  • Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:44:09 -0500

On 09/06/2011 05:45 AM, Bor Kraljič wrote:
> We have new bug tracker now on chiliproject. We started without any bugs.
> Which is good since old bugzila had quite a few bugs to many:) But bugs on
> new
> issue tracker are piling up fast. We also have few "master" bugs. That
> brings
> me to the point of this email.
>
> In my opinion "master bug" should contain only short description of the
> problem. And subtasks with more information for each small problem should
> be
> created. (example http://sourcemage.org/issues/53) That way master bug
> offers
> transparent view of what has already been done and what we still need to
> do.
>
> Otherwise those bugs can really become hard to follow what has been done
> and
> what not. (example http://sourcemage.org/issues/30).

This is good advice in general to follow.

We can also take advantage of RoadMaps which make it easy to determine
what we're going to have in a release. Roadmaps can be shared amongst
projects as well, which can help us keep in sync if we have a release
that needs stuff in multiple projects to happen.

Keep up the good work :)

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page