sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Redmine Project structure
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:00:14 -0500
I've created projects for our major components.
Sorcery, Cauldron, Grimoire.
I've created a project for IMP and it's subprojects for data.
What we need to decide on now is the other projects that would go up on
the site.
They need to have owners, a "component lead" if you will. Or I can make
a new role on the site called "Project Owner" since we have specific
requirements for Component Leads, as per our voting process.
Or we can go a step further and make these real supported components, as
we have our other three. That's also a reasonable solution.
It's been mentioned to me that we should have one for quill and some of
the other projects there, perhaps castfs.
What do you all think?
David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Redmine Project structure,
David Kowis, 05/25/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Redmine Project structure, Arjan Bouter, 05/31/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.