sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
- To: "SM-Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:25:35 +0200
On Friday 01 of April 2011 09:20:10 flux wrote:
> Jaka Kranjc (smgl AT lynxlynx.info) wrote [11.04.01 16:14]:
> > While I like the idea of code share, I'm not sure people would appreciate
> > all the new basesystem dependencies just to have sorcery working. The
> > future is in the embedded targets, so we should have space and power
> > constraints in our minds at all times.
> >
> > LP
>
> Very true! That's exactly why I've gone for .NET (or Java, pending
> lawsuits and all). Think of all the mobile platforms already running
> these! I wonder how tricky it would be to port cauldron to other OSs
> once it's reimplemented (and potentially sorcery if it is also
> reimplemented)... A future of sorcery managing Window app installs, and
> cauldron replacing the windows install CD? The possibilities!
Please create a wiki page for this, so we can start hashing out the details.
LP
--
To err is humor
-
[SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead, Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead, David Kowis, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.