Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
  • To: "SM-Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead
  • Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:14:11 +0200

On Friday 01 of April 2011 08:53:26 flux wrote:
> Jaka Kranjc (smgl AT lynxlynx.info) wrote [11.04.01 15:44]:
> > Finally someone to break the bash mono-poly! I wonder what to do with
> > sorcery now ...
> >
> > LP
>
> I'll be writing as much as I can modularly, so maybe cauldron and
> sorcery can play together? I was actually thinking of merging the two,
> but I wanted to get your input on that first (and wasn't completely
> ready to propose it, which is why I hadn't).
While I like the idea of code share, I'm not sure people would appreciate all
the new basesystem dependencies just to have sorcery working. The future is
in
the embedded targets, so we should have space and power constraints in our
minds at all times.

LP
--
To err is humor




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page