sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
- To: "SM-Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:14:11 +0200
On Friday 01 of April 2011 08:53:26 flux wrote:
> Jaka Kranjc (smgl AT lynxlynx.info) wrote [11.04.01 15:44]:
> > Finally someone to break the bash mono-poly! I wonder what to do with
> > sorcery now ...
> >
> > LP
>
> I'll be writing as much as I can modularly, so maybe cauldron and
> sorcery can play together? I was actually thinking of merging the two,
> but I wanted to get your input on that first (and wasn't completely
> ready to propose it, which is why I hadn't).
While I like the idea of code share, I'm not sure people would appreciate all
the new basesystem dependencies just to have sorcery working. The future is
in
the embedded targets, so we should have space and power constraints in our
minds at all times.
LP
--
To err is humor
-
[SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead, Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead, David Kowis, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.