sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: flux <flux AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 16:20:10 +0900
Jaka Kranjc (smgl AT lynxlynx.info) wrote [11.04.01 16:14]:
> While I like the idea of code share, I'm not sure people would appreciate
> all
> the new basesystem dependencies just to have sorcery working. The future is
> in
> the embedded targets, so we should have space and power constraints in our
> minds at all times.
>
> LP
Very true! That's exactly why I've gone for .NET (or Java, pending
lawsuits and all). Think of all the mobile platforms already running
these! I wonder how tricky it would be to port cauldron to other OSs
once it's reimplemented (and potentially sorcery if it is also
reimplemented)... A future of sorcery managing Window app installs, and
cauldron replacing the windows install CD? The possibilities!
--
Justin "flux_control" Boffemmyer
Cauldron wizard and general mage
Source Mage GNU/Linux
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpVwlC2aGghA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead, Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
flux, 04/01/2011
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead, David Kowis, 04/01/2011
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Cauldron is dead,
Jaka Kranjc, 04/01/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.