sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43))
- From: George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43))
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:57:23 -0500
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:49:47 -0700
Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> George Sherwood wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:24:03 -0700
> > Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> wrote:
> >
> >> 4.86BETA9 or 4.85BETA9? :)
> >>
> > Fat fingered. Always believe DETAILS and HISTORY. :)
>
> Has anyone thought anymore of having HISTORY auto-generated from `git
> commit`? It'd be nice to not have to enter the information twice. ;)
> That means our commit messages would have to be more verbose than they
> currently our. ;)
>
> - ----
> Brief one-liner
>
> Normal HISTORY entry
> - ----
>
> e.g.
> - ----
> ekiga: Updated to 3.0
>
> DETAILS: Updated to 3.0
> - ----
>
> Then `git commit` would add all but the newline to HISTORY. I suppose
> we should move this to SM-Discuss? :)
>
>
For me almost the opposite would be easier. I wish it was possible to
generate my commit message from the quill generated HISTORY entry.
Almost all of my updates are doing using quill. I just change the
wording a little bit, but it is nice to have the version already
there. No entry mistakes.
George
--
George Sherwood
Source Mage GNU/Linux Lead Developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)),
Eric Sandall, 06/11/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)),
George Sherwood, 06/11/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)), flux, 06/11/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)), Jaka Kranjc, 06/12/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)),
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 06/12/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)),
Seth Alan Woolley, 06/12/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)), Thomas Orgis, 06/12/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)), Eric Sandall, 06/12/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)), flux, 06/12/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)),
Seth Alan Woolley, 06/12/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Auto-generated HISTORY from `git commit` (was Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master grimoire by George Sherwood (7041bfdaf256227abdacc42113e14388785aae43)),
George Sherwood, 06/11/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.