sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Remko van der Vossen <wich AT yuugen.jp>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:17:40 +0200
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 11:37:46AM -0500, George Sherwood wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 2009 18:25:33 +0200
> Treeve Jelbert <treeve AT scarlet.be> wrote:
> > Most other distros seem to have patched qt4 to use libiodbc.
> >
> > Would it upset any users of unixodbc, if we also went this route?
>
> Would such a patch still allow unixodbc? Hopefully we could still
> use both, I am not an expert in this area though.
>
> You probably noticed that I had to patch qt4 to compile with recent
> versions of unixodbc this weekend.
Is upstream aware of this situation, both the new unixodbc issue as well
as the Soprano issue? Have they provided any view on the matter?
Is it really necessary to have the optional dependencies enabled for
both qt4 and virtuoso?
Remko.
Attachment:
pgpQDWnZ13DKl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
Treeve Jelbert, 05/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
George Sherwood, 05/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
Remko van der Vossen, 05/04/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells, Treeve Jelbert, 05/04/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells, George Sherwood, 05/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
Remko van der Vossen, 05/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
George Sherwood, 05/04/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.