sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: George Sherwood <pilot AT beernabeer.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:37:46 -0500
On Mon, 4 May 2009 18:25:33 +0200
Treeve Jelbert <treeve AT scarlet.be> wrote:
> we have two odbc mutually conflicting spells, unixodbc and libiodbc,
> which can be used interchangeably in many situations.
> However, qt4 requires unixodbc and virtuoso needs libiodbc.
>
> SOprano, which is needed for kde4, needs both qt4 and virtuoso.
>
> Most other distros seem to have patched qt4 to use libiodbc.
>
> Would it upset any users of unixodbc, if we also went this route?
>
Would such a patch still allow unixodbc? Hopefully we could still
use both, I am not an expert in this area though.
You probably noticed that I had to patch qt4 to compile with recent
versions of unixodbc this weekend.
George
--
George Sherwood
Source Mage GNU/Linux Lead Developer
http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
Treeve Jelbert, 05/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
George Sherwood, 05/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
Remko van der Vossen, 05/04/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells, Treeve Jelbert, 05/04/2009
- Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells, George Sherwood, 05/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
Remko van der Vossen, 05/04/2009
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] odbc spells,
George Sherwood, 05/04/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.