sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jaka Kranjc <smgl AT lynxlynx.info>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:45:29 +0200
On Wednesday 10 of September 2008 21:39:43 Vlad Glagolev wrote:
> > IMO, test is for testing our packages, not specifically for testing
> > upstream bugs. ;)
>
> lol, right. And I repeat again and again. Test is for testing yes, but it
> _must_ be usable while DECREMENTING the problems, not INCREMENTING the
> potential bugs.
Yeah, that's clearly written somewhere. And gcc 4.3 is a great example that
proves it. Not.
And I bet gtk 2.14 fixes some bugs since 2.12.1 too.
LP
--
We cannot command nature except by obeying her. --Sir Francis Bacon
Have a sourcerous day! www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Robin Cook, 09/10/2008
-
[SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED,
Vlad Glagolev, 09/10/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Robin Cook, 09/11/2008
- [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Vlad Glagolev, 09/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Glyn Kennington, 09/11/2008
- [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Vlad Glagolev, 09/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Eric Sandall, 09/14/2008
- [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Vlad Glagolev, 09/15/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Jaka Kranjc, 09/10/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Jaka Kranjc, 09/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Jaka Kranjc, 09/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED,
Robin Cook, 09/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, Arjan Bouter, 09/15/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GTK+2 UPDATE REVERTED, George Sherwood, 09/10/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.