sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells
- From: "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" <ruskie AT codemages.net>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:12:22 +0200
On 14:05:08 2008-07-22 flux <flux AT sourcemage.org> wrote:
> "Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik" (ruskie AT codemages.net) wrote [08.07.22
> 07:35]: > 1)
> > DETAILS file is aligned on = I propose no tabs in this file as we
> > have now:
> > SPELL=foo
> > VERSION=bar
> > SOURCE=$SPELL-VERSION
> >
> > Tabs here would mess it up
> I'm fine with this (it's what we already have anyway).
>
> > 2)
> > BUILD file when not default tends to be aligned on some conditional
> > clauses and end of line with configure and options:
> > if [[ foo == bar ]; then
> > [tab]./configure --opt1 \
> > [tab] --opt2 \
> > [tab] --opt3 &&
> > [tab]make
> > fi
> >
> > ([tab] means tab and " " space means space... so in the above lines
> > there's only one tab...)
> There is a new issue that comes up with tabs: not everyone has tabs set
> to the same width, so the formatting will be different on different
> screens (this is probably the reason for the "no tabs" policy).
> Tabspacing can be redefined in the different editors, but I have a
> feeling we will end up in a war about tabspacing... "8 is best! No 4 is
> best! You're all losers, 2! WTF, 5!" ad nauseum.
>
Irrelevant... since tabs won't be used for alignment... aligning will be
done with spaces... SO everything will always look the same just different
indentaions... hence why I used [tab]...
--
Andraž "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker
Be sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodies.
Ryle hira.
Key id = F4C1F89C
Key fingerprint = 6FF2 8F20 4C9D DB36 B5B6 F134 884D 72CC F4C1 F89C
-
[SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
flux, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
seth, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
Ethan Grammatikidis, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
flux, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
David Kowis, 07/22/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells, Mathieu Lonjaret, 07/23/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells, Juuso Alasuutari, 07/23/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells, flux, 07/23/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells, Ethan Grammatikidis, 07/26/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells, Ethan Grammatikidis, 07/27/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells, Juuso Alasuutari, 07/28/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
David Kowis, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
flux, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
Ethan Grammatikidis, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
seth, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik, 07/22/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Request for comments - formating in spells,
flux, 07/22/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.