Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

On Tuesday 15 April 2008 01:32:15 Thomas Orgis wrote:
> So...
>
>
> Shall I remove the MPG123 provider, then?
> Point is also, that mpg321 didn't fulfill that provider for 1,5 years now
> and nobody noticed (?).
>
> I'd like to drop the provider, make the spells depend on the real mpg123
> and remove the conflict between the spells so that people who prever mpg321
> (MAD) decoding or some special feature of libao over mpg123 for their
> personal use can still install mpg321 along mpg123.
>
> Can I get some definite for/agains votes, so that people don't blame me
> (mpg123 guy) of just killing off a concurrent software project (which
> intended to kill mine;-)?
>
>
> Alrighty then,
>
> Thomas.

If one doesn't really provide the other, then yeah, drop the provides. And if 
the old code is still required for some functionality, I guess we should keep 
it.

-sandalle

-- 
Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  http://counter.li.org/  #196285

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.