sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
- From: Ismael Luceno <ismael.luceno AT gmail.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:44:10 -0300
El Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:26:40 +0200
Ladislav Hagara <ladislav.hagara AT unob.cz> escribió:
>
> >> So here is the sorted initial list of the shortcuts and what they
> >> woud run: cc - cast --queue (who can spell queue anyway?)
> >> cp - cleanse --prune
> >> dd - dispel --downgrade
> >> gs - gaze search
> >> gv - gaze version
> >> sg - sorcery upgrade
> >> sh - sorcery hold
> >> sq - sorcery -q
> >> su - scribe update
> >>
> >
> > In my opinion these are a very bad idea. They will confuse users
> > more (because the meaning behind them will be hidden), and worse,
> > they will
>
> I also do not like this idea. It is very confusing. Moreover most of
> your shortcuts are regular names of Unix commands.
>
> For new users I would created links started with smgl- (smgl-cast;
> smgl-dispel; smgl-scribe; ...) so if user does not know the right
> command he/she just writes smgl- and presses TAB and can see all
> sorcery commands.
>
> Users can use bash-completion.
>
+1
--
Ismael Luceno
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Jaka Kranjc, 03/31/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
flux, 03/31/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/31/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Eric K Sandall, 03/31/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
seth, 03/31/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Eric K Sandall, 03/31/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
seth, 03/31/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results, Ismael Luceno, 03/31/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Eric K Sandall, 03/31/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
Ladislav Hagara, 03/31/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] RFC: sorcery usabilty study results,
flux, 03/31/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.