sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:29:21 -0800
Quoting Jaka Kranjc <lynx AT mages.ath.cx>:
I agree, but I just wanted to hear some more opinions first.
I ran this on test and committed the result:
find -name "*.gpg" |
while read kr; do
gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring $kr --refresh-keys;
gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring $kr --list-keys |
grep -o "/[^ ]*" | cut -d/ -f2 |
xargs -I I -- gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring $kr --edit-key I clean
save;
done
It refreshed all the keys in all the keyrings then cleaned them up (removed
unusable signatures and more). Crosscertification was done automatically it
seems, that code alone fixed findutils. I didn't check any of the others.
If nothing is wrong, I'll run it over other grimoires once I get back home.
LP; Happy Holidays!
It seems you need the secret key to cross-certify GPG keys, we can't go and clean up others'.
For Bug #14212[0] (ghostscript-fonts-{std,other} failing GPG check) I tried to cross-certify the key used, but ran into the following:
# gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring ./gurus.gpg --edit-key 1C3593C7
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.8; Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
pub 1024D/1C3593C7 created: 2004-08-20 expires: never usage: SCA
trust: unknown validity: unknown
sub 1024g/ABF14576 created: 2004-08-20 expires: never usage: E
sub 2048R/D3125DC1 created: 2005-09-13 expires: never usage: S
[ unknown] (1). Jason Flatt (Source Mage GNU/Linux: http://www.sourcemage.org/ - IRC nick: Oadae) <jflatt AT sourcemage.org>
Command> cross-certify
Need the secret key to do this.
Shall we verify (non-strict) the tarball still matches the GPG and then re-sign with a cross-certified key?
-sandalle
[0] http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14212
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us PGP: 0xA8EFDD61 | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | http://counter.li.org/ #196285
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Eric Sandall, 01/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Jaka Kranjc, 01/11/2008
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter, Remko van der Vossen, 01/11/2008
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnupg 1.4.8 is stricter,
Jaka Kranjc, 01/11/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.